Why don’t witches use wireless routers?
Because they prefer “spell-bound” connections!
How do hackers celebrate Halloween?
They perform a full system “trick or treat” scan!
What’s a ghost’s favorite programming language?
BOO-tstrap!
Magnite
Senior Manager Business Development
https://lnkd.in/di-mFkye
Haymarket
Associate Audience Analyst
https://lnkd.in/dkGTDmrJ
StackAdapt
Partnership Manager, Channel and Technology
https://lnkd.in/dTi-BrJq
Why Hawk Productions?
Creative Excellence: Transforming ideas into visually stunning narratives.
Tailored Solutions: Customized video content that aligns with your brand’s voice.
Cutting-Edge Technology: Delivering high-quality content across all platforms.
Proven Results: Videos that entertain, convert, and inspire.
Our Collaboration: Our partnership with Hawk Productions allows us to offer comprehensive video production services, seamlessly integrated into our consulting solutions. Ready to create something great? Let’s connect and elevate your brand together.
Hawk Digital specializes in elevating brand visibility and engagement through cutting-edge digital media services. Our expertise spans Online, Mobile, and Connected TV (CTV) advertising, along with video production and strategic content creation. By leveraging the latest technologies, industry standards, and retail media strategies, we craft targeted advertising campaigns that deliver measurable results. Hawk is dedicated to helping brands and agencies maximize their reach and achieve successful attribution for their marketing objectives.
The case of Mr. Beast’s upcoming Amazon series, surrounded by negative publicity and legal disputes, highlights a broader challenge facing social media creators attempting to transition into traditional media. Mr. Beast, known for his wildly popular YouTube content, is facing difficulties with his Amazon series, raising the question of whether creators from platforms like YouTube can truly break out of their digital niche and find success in more conventional spaces. This phenomenon isn’t new, as we saw with PewDiePie’s ill-fated 2017 series “Scare PewDiePie,” which faced its own controversies.
This struggle matters because social media audiences tend to be fickle and often grow out of their fascination with certain creators. For example, many of PewDiePie’s fans, who adored him as teenagers, may no longer find his content appealing as they enter adulthood. This shift in viewer engagement creates challenges for creators who have built their fame on platforms like YouTube, where the audience’s loyalty may not always translate to success on new platforms or in different formats.
The Challenges of Second Acts in Entertainment
It’s not just social media creators who struggle with transitioning to new platforms. The concept of “second acts” in entertainment is notoriously difficult across the board. For instance, cast members from major TV shows like Lost have largely faded from the spotlight since the show’s conclusion, even though Lost was a dominant force in television during its time. Conversely, actors like Steve Carell and John Krasinski from The Office have successfully built thriving careers after the show ended, using their popularity as a springboard to establish themselves in new roles within Hollywood.
This is why second acts remain such a coveted achievement in the entertainment industry—success in a new medium often enhances the long-term value of the original content, allowing TV shows or online series to retain their cultural significance through the continued popularity of their stars.
The “Creatorverse” Dilemma: Is it TV or Something Else?
One of the key questions raised by Mr. Beast’s struggles is how to categorize content produced by social media creators. The industry is grappling with whether the content made by YouTube stars and other online influencers should be viewed as part of the television ecosystem or if it is an entirely separate category. This is not just a theoretical debate; it has practical implications for advertisers, agencies, and networks looking to monetize and engage with this form of entertainment.
“Creator” content typically has distinct characteristics—it is often short-form (less than 15 minutes), made with lower production values compared to network television, and revolves around the creator’s persona, with the creator frequently handling all aspects of production. This contrasts with traditional TV shows or films, which involve larger crews, higher budgets, and more formalized production processes.
Nielsen’s The Gauge, which tracks viewing habits, often shows that YouTube is the most-watched streaming service, particularly on actual TVs. Despite this, the traditional media industry often dismisses YouTube content as “cat videos” or unserious fare. This dismissal complicates the way creators and their content are viewed within the broader entertainment ecosystem.
The Business of Monetizing Creators
If social media content is part of the TV ecosystem, then monetizing it becomes a challenge. Many creators rely on sponsorships and brand deals, rather than traditional advertising. YouTube itself controls much of the advertising inventory for creators, making it difficult for outside advertisers to penetrate the space in the same way they do with network TV shows. The same goes for platforms like Meta (Facebook) and Bytedance (TikTok), where creators often build their brands but don’t have full control over ad placement.
This raises another issue for advertisers: how do you differentiate between low-budget, short-form content (like the aforementioned “cat videos”) and more polished productions, such as scripted web series made by experienced creators? Some of these web series, dubbed “Pro-Am” content, blend amateur and professional production styles and can resemble network TV shows in length and quality, yet they still exist within the YouTube ecosystem. The problem is that YouTube doesn’t clearly categorize these different types of content, which makes it difficult for advertisers and networks to decide how to engage with them.
Recommendations for YouTube and the Industry
If YouTube wants to help the traditional TV industry better understand and utilize its platform, one solution could be to create a taxonomy of content. This would involve clearly distinguishing between types of content, such as short-form viral videos, longer-form scripted series, and creator-driven material. While this taxonomy wouldn’t necessarily need to be shown to consumers, it could be an invaluable tool for advertisers and those involved in ratings and measurement, allowing them to engage with the content in a more strategic way.
For the television industry, the key takeaway is to avoid trying to replicate YouTube’s model. The sheer diversity and innovation within YouTube’s ecosystem, which ranges from informal vlogs to scripted series, cannot be easily copied by traditional media platforms. Instead, networks should look for creators whose talent and appeal can translate across different mediums. Mr. Beast, for instance, may have millions of followers on YouTube, but his niche style of content might not appeal to broader audiences on a platform like Amazon. On the other hand, there are creators who could successfully transition to TV or film, and the challenge for the industry is identifying and supporting those creators.
The music industry offers a potential roadmap here. For years, record labels have been scouting talent from social media and turning viral hits into sustainable careers. This model could be applied to creators from YouTube and other platforms, finding those with the potential for longevity and helping them navigate the transition from online fame to mainstream success.
The Uncertain Future of Social Media Creators in Traditional Media
For the rest of the entertainment industry, particularly those involved in advertising, the advice is to take things slow. The landscape is rapidly evolving, with new players, technologies, and regulations (such as the government’s scrutiny of Google) all influencing the future of social media content. In this uncertain environment, it’s wise to carefully assess the situation before making any bold moves.
In conclusion, while Mr. Beast’s struggles with his Amazon series exemplify the difficulties social media creators face in breaking into traditional media, the broader challenge is figuring out how to integrate or differentiate this kind of content within the entertainment ecosystem. As the lines between TV and digital media continue to blur, it will be crucial for networks, advertisers, and platforms like YouTube to navigate these challenges thoughtfully, with an eye toward fostering talent that can succeed across multiple formats.
